In-service monitoring of a fiberoptic network

ABSTRACT

An optical fiber breakage point may be located by coupling to the optical fiber an out-of-band optical test signal modulated at a periodic modulation pattern. A distance to the breakage point may be determined from a difference between modulation patterns of transmitted and received test signals.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.14/521,878, filed Oct. 23, 2014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,281,893), whichclaims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/894,552,filed Oct. 23, 2013, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein byreference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to optical communications equipment, andin particular to in-service monitoring of optical networks.

BACKGROUND

In a fiberoptic network, optical signals are encoded with digitalstreams of information and transmitted through a series of spans ofoptical fiber. At a receiver end, the optical signals are detected anddecoded by a receiver. In Fiber to the Home (FTTH) applications,modulated optical carrier signals are used to relay broadband coaxialcable signals to and from end users. Similarly, in Fiber to the Antenna(FTTA) applications, modulated optical carrier signals are used to relaybroadband radio frequency (RF) signals to and from antennas. In FIT Aapplications, a single optical fiber is used for bidirectionaltransmission, with a 1550 nm wavelength band being typically used fordownstream transmission from a central station to an RF antenna, and a1310 nm wavelength band used for an upstream transmission, that is, fromthe RF antenna back to the central station.

As passive fiberoptic links find an increasing use, so increaseoccurrences of fiber breakage, faulty fiber connections, open fibers,etc. A fiber breakage, or a mere deterioration of a fiber transmission,may occur during normal operation of a passive fiberoptic link. Thus, aneed exists for monitoring fiber network integrity and performancelevel.

One drawback of prior art monitoring systems is that a precise locationof the fiber breakage point in a fiberoptic network is unknown. Sincefiberoptic network may span for leas and even hundreds of kilometers insome cases, it is desirable that a monitoring system have a fiber breaklocating functionality.

One known method of determining a distance to a fiber breakage isOptical Time-Domain Reflectometry (OTDR). In OTDR, a powerful laserpulse is launched at a proximal end of a fiberoptic link, and a timedependence of the reflected light power is monitored. Since speed oflight in the fiberoptic link being tested is known, the distance to afiber breakage point may be determined by measuring a time delay betweenthe launched pulse and a pulse reflected from the fiber breakage point.OTDR, however, may disturb normal operation of a fiberoptic link,because the powerful laser pulse may interfere with optical datatransmission. Furthermore. OTDR output data are rather complex, andrequire trained personnel to interpret.

SUMMARY

In one embodiment, an optical fiber breakage point may be located bycoupling to the optical fiber an out-of-band optical test signalmodulated at a modulation frequency that is periodically swept or rampedin time. A distance to the breakage point may be determined from adifference between a value of the modulation frequency of the opticaltest signal reflected from the breakage point, and a current value ofthe modulation frequency of the optical signal being coupled to theoptical fiber.

In some implementations, there is provided a system for in-servicemonitoring of a fiberoptic network comprising a first fiberoptic linkspanning between a test location and a first remote location, whereinthe first fiberoptic link carries a first information signal at a firstwavelength between the test location and the first remote location, thesystem comprising:

a transmitter comprising a light source for generating an optical testsignal at a test wavelength different from the first wavelength, whereinthe optical test signal is modulated at a modulation frequencyperiodically swept at a sweep period from a first modulation frequencyto a second modulation frequency;

a first test channel comprising:

a first coupler for optically coupling the light source to the firstfiberoptic link at the test location, for causing the optical testsignal to propagate along the first fiberoptic link towards the firstremote location;

a first wavelength-selective reflector for optically coupling into thefiberoptic link at the first remote location, for redirecting theoptical test signal at the test wavelength to propagate back towards thetest location, while propagating therethrough the first informationsignal at the first wavelength;

a first signal photodetector optically coupled to the first coupler, fordefecting a first returning optical test signal at the test wavelengthpropagating in a direction from the first remote location towards thefirst coupler; and

controller operationally coupled to the first signal photodetector andoperable to:

determine a magnitude of the second returning optical test signal;

determine a modulation frequency offset of the second returning opticaltest signal relative to a current value of the periodically sweptmodulation frequency; and

detect a fault in the second fiberoptic link based on at least one of:

a comparison between the determined magnitude of the second returningoptical test signal and a reference magnitude of the optical test signalredirected by the second wavelength-selective reflector; and

a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offset of thesecond returning optical test signal to a reference modulation frequencyoffset of the optical test signal redirected by the secondwavelength-selective reflector.

In one embodiment, the transmitter comprises a linear frequency rampgenerator operably coupled to the light source for modulating the lightsource so that the modulation frequency is ramped linearly during eachsweep period. The system may be expanded or upgraded to monitor multiplefiberoptic links of the fiberoptic network, by providing a Similar,separate test channel tor each additional fiberoptic link to bemonitored.

In accordance with the embodiments disclosed herein, there is furtherprovided a method for in-service monitoring of a fiberoptic networkcomprising a fiberoptic link spanning between spaced apart a testlocation and a remote location, wherein the fiberoptic link carries aninformation signal at a first wavelength between the test location andthe remote location, the method comprising:

(a) generating an optical test signal at a test wavelength differentfrom the first wavelength, wherein the optical test signal is modulatedat a modulation frequency periodically swept at a sweep period from afirst modulation frequency to a second modulation frequency;

(b) optically coupling the optical test signal to the fiberoptic link atthe test location, thereby causing the optical test signal to propagatealong the fiberoptic link to the remote location;

(c) using a wavelength-selective reflector disposed at the remotelocation to redirect the optical test signal at the test wavelength topropagate back towards the test location, while propagating therethroughthe information signal;

(d) detecting a returning optical least signal at the test wavelengthpropagating in a direction from the remote location towards the testlocation;

(e) determining a magnitude of the returning optical test signal, anddetermining a modulation frequency offset of the returning optical testsignal relative to a current value of the periodically swept modulationfrequency; and

(f) detecting a fault in the fiberoptic link based on at least one of:

a comparison between the magnitude of the first returning optical testsignal determined in step (c) and a reference magnitude of the opticaltest signal redirected by the wavelength-selective reflector in step(c); and

a comparison between the modulation frequency offset of the returningoptical test signal determined in step (e) and a reference modulationfrequency offset of the optical test signal redirected by thewavelength-selective reflector in step (c).

Step (f) of the above method may include determining that a fiber breakhas occurred in the fiberoptic link when the modulation frequency offsetof the returning optical test signal is smaller than the referencemodulation frequency offset; and/or determining that a deterioration hasoccurred in the fiberoptic link when a magnitude of the returningoptical signal at the reference modulation frequency offset is less thanthe reference magnitude.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Exemplary embodiments will now be described in conjunction with thedrawings, in which:

FIG. 1A illustrates a schematic view of a fiberoptic network havinginstalled an in-service monitoring system;

FIG. 1B illustrates a schematic view of the in-service monitoring systeminstalled in the fiberoptic network of FIG. 1A;

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of an embodiment of the monitoringsystem of FIG. 1B:

FIG. 3A illustrates a time dependence of a modulation frequency of atest signal according to a preferred embodiment, in which the modulationfrequency is linearly ramped;

FIG. 3B illustrates a time dependence of the modulation amplitude whenthe modulation frequency is linearly ramped as shown in FIG. 3A;

FIG. 4 illustrates a frequency spectrum of a returning test signalmeasured by the monitoring system of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5A illustrates a frequency spectrum of a returning test signalduring normal operation of the fiberoptic link being monitored;

FIG. 5B illustrates a frequency spectrum of a returning test signal upondetecting an open fiber in the fiberoptic link being monitored;

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a frequency spectrum of a returningsignal measured by the system of FIG. 2;

FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of an embodiment of a modulated lightsource of the monitoring system of FIG. 1B;

FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of an embodiment of a digital mixerof the monitoring system of FIG. 1B;

FIG. 9 illustrates a block diagram of an embodiment of a monitoringsystem having a reference photodiode;

FIG. 10 illustrates a block diagram of a multi-channel embodiment of amonitoring system;

FIGS. 11A to 11D illustrate block diagrams of various illustrativeembodiments of the monitoring systems of FIG. 1B, FIG. 9. and FIG. 10;and

FIG. 12 illustrates a flow chart of a method embodiment for in-servicemonitoring a fiberoptic network.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

While the present teachings are described in conjunction with variousembodiments and examples, it is not intended that the present teachingsbe limited to such embodiments. On the contrary, the present teachingsencompass various alternatives and equivalents, as will be appreciatedby those of skill in the art. In FIGS. 1A, 1B, 2, and 7 to 11, similarreference numerals refer to similar elements.

Referring to FIG. 1A, a system 100 for in-service monitoring of afiberoptic network 102 may be provided as described below. Thefiberoptic network 102 may include a network node 101 and a plurality offiberoptic links 103 including a first fiberoptic link 104. Thefiberoptic links 103, 104 are connected to the network node 101. Thesystem 100 is shown installed into the first fiberoptic link 104 formonitoring the first fiberoptic link 104, which spans between a testlocation 106 and a first remote location 108 of the fiberoptic network102.

During normal operation, the first fiberoptic link 104 carries a firstinformation signal 110 at a first wavelength λ₁ between the testlocation 106 and an RF antenna 105 disposed at the first remote location108, for radio transmission of the first information signal 110. Ofcourse, the RF antenna 105 is only an example, and may be replaced withanother terminal device, or another node, not shown, of the fiberopticnetwork 102. Furthermore, the transmission on the first fiberoptic link104 may be, and frequently is, bidirectional.

Turning to FIG. 1B, the system 100 is shown in a greater detail. Thesystem 100 may include a transmitter 112 including a light source 114and a modulator/driver 128 operationally coupled to the light source114. The light source 114 (e.g. a laser diode) generates an optical testsignal 116 at a test wavelength λ_(T) different from the firstwavelength λ₁. In accordance with one embodiment, the optical testsignal 116 is modulated by the modulator/driver 128 at a modulationfrequency f, which is periodically swept at a sweep period T from afirst modulation frequency f₁ to a second, different modulationfrequency f₂. Depending on construction of the modulator/driver 128. themodulation frequency may be swept linearly or non-linearly fromfrequency f₁ to frequency f₂. The optical test signal 116 may also beamplitude modulated, phase modulated, or frequency modulated. Anexternal modulator may also be used (not shown in FIG. 1B).

The system 100 further includes a first “test channel” 118 dedicated tomonitoring the first fiberoptic link 104. The first test channel 118 mayinclude a first coupler 120 for optically coupling the light source 114to the first fiberoptic link 104 at the test location 106, forpropagating the optical test signal 116 generated by the light source114 along the first fiberoptic link 104 towards the first remotelocation 108. In the embodiment shown, the first coupler 120 includes awavelength division multiplexor (WDM) 130 for multiplexing the opticaltest signal 116 at the test wavelength λ_(T) and the first informationsignal 110 at the first wavelength λ₁, and an optical splitter 132optically coupled at its output port 151 to the WDM 130.

The first test channel 118 may further include a firstwavelength-selective reflector 122 (FIG. 1B) optically coupled into thefirst fiberoptic link 104 at the first remote location 108 (FIG. 1A),for redirecting e.g. reflecting the optical test signal 116 at the testwavelength λ_(T) to propagate back towards the test location 106. At thesame time, the first wavelength-selective reflector 122 may propagatethrough, e.g. transmit, the first information signal 110 at the firstwavelength λ₁, for reception at the RF antenna 105 or another terminalor intermediate communications device, as the case may be.

The first test channel 118 may further include a first signalphotodetector 124 optically coupled to the first coupler 120, fordetecting a first returning optical test signal 117 at the testwavelength λ_(T) propagating in a direction from the first remotelocation 108 towards the first coupler 120 disposed at the test location106. More specifically, the first signal photodctector 124 is opticallycoupled to the optical splitter 132. which is optically coupled to theWDM 130, which is optically coupled to the first fiberoptic link 104 atthe test location 106.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1B, the optical splitter 132 has first141 and second 142 input ports and an output port 151. The assignment ofports as “input” and “output” ports is for convenience only, because theoptical splitter 132 is a bidirectional device. The first input port 141is optically coupled to the light source 114 of the transmitter 112 forcoupling the optical test signal 116 into the first fiberoptic link 104,and the second input port 142 is optically coupled to the first signalphotodctector 124, for receiving the first returning optical test signal117. The output port 151 is optically coupled to the WDM 130 forlaunching the optical test signal 116 and for receiving the firstreturning optical test signal 117.

The system 100 may further include a controller 126 operationallycoupled to the first signal photodetector 124. The controller 126 may beoperable, e.g. via a software or hardware configuration, to determine amodulation frequency offset Δf of the first returning optical testsignal 117 relative to a current value of the periodically sweptmodulation frequency f, and determining a magnitude M(Δf) of the firstreturning optical test signal 117 at the modulation frequency offset Δf.The current modulation signal at the periodically swept modulationfrequency f may be obtained by the controller 126 from themodulator/driver 128 via a control line 127.

The controller 126 may be further configured for detecting a fault inthe first fiberoptic link 104 based on the determined modulationfrequency offset Δf and the determined magnitude M(Δf) of the firstreturning optical test signal 117. More specifically, the controller 126may be configured for determining the fault in the first fiberoptic link104 based on the determined modulation frequency offset Δf and thedetermined magnitude M(Δf) in relation to a “reference” modulationfrequency offset Δf_(REF) and a “reference” magnitude M_(REF)(Δf_(REF)),respectively, of the optical test signal 116 redirected by the firstwavelength-selective reflector 122 to propagate back to the testlocation 106. In other words, the first wavelength-selective reflector122 may function as an amplitude and frequency reference for thedetected first returning optical test signal 117. allowing alength-to-fault and optical throughput calibration. During setting up ofthe monitoring system 100, a technician may measure the referencemagnitude M_(REF) and the frequency offset Δf_(REF) of the optical testsignal 116 redirected (reflected) by the first wavelength-selectivereflector 122 to propagate back to the test location 106, and store thereference magnitude M_(REF) and the frequency offset Δf_(REF) memory ofthe controller 126. During the subsequent monitoring, the controller 126may perform a comparison between the determined magnitude M of the firstreturning optical test signal 117 and a reference magnitude M_(REF)stored in the memory of the controller 126. The controller 126 may alsoperform a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offsetΔf of the first returning optical test signal 117 to a referencemodulation frequency offset Δf_(REF) stored in the memory of thecontroller 126.

Referring to FIG. 2, a system 200 for in-service monitoring the firstfiberoptic link 104 is an illustrative embodiment of the system 100 ofFIGS. 1A and 1B. The system 200 of FIG. 2 includes a transmitter 212, aWDM coupler 220 optically coupled to the transmitter 212, a photodiode224 optically coupled to the WDM coupler 220, a transimpedance amplifier(TIA) 225 electrically coupled to the photodiode 224, a controller 226electrically coupled to the TIA 225 and the transmitter 212. a detectioncontrol unit 239 electrically coupled to the controller 226, and a wavelength-selective reflector 222 optically coupled to the first remotelocation 108 of the first fiberoptic link 104. The transmitter 212includes serially coupled a signal source 228A, a laser driver 228B, anda laser diode 214 emitting at the wavelength of 1625 nm in thisillustrative example.

The signal source 228A provides a modulation signal 229 for modulatingthe laser driver 228B. The signal source 228A functions as a frequencyramp generator, preferably a linear frequency ramp generator. In otherwords, it is preferable that the modulation signal 229 have themodulation frequency f_(M) periodically linearly ramped, or changinglinearly with time e.g. in sawtooth-like fashion.

Referring to FIGS. 3A and 3B, a time dependence 302 (FIG. 3A) of themodulation frequency f of the modulation signal 229 is shown. One cansee that the modulation frequency f increases linearly in time from thefirst f₁ to the second f₂ modulation frequency, with a period T. Afrequency sweeping range B (FIG. 3A) is equal to f₂−f₁. FIG. 3Billustrates a time dependence of the linearly frequency rampedmodulation signal 229. In FIG. 3A. the modulation frequency f_(M) isramped linearly during each sweep period T. The frequency f_(M) may alsobe periodically ramped down, or ramped up and then down, preferably in alinear fashion for simplified processing.

Referring back to FIG. 2, the modulation signal 229 may be applied tothe laser driver 228B for providing a driving current 231 that isamplitude modulated with the linearly ramped modulation frequency f asexplained above. As a result, the optical test signal 116 is amplitudemodulated with linearly ramped modulation frequency f. Emissionwavelength of the laser diode 214 may also be modulated in some types ofthe laser diode 214. The amplitude modulated optical test signal 116 iscoupled to the WDM coupler 220. where it is multiplexed with the firstinformation signal 110. Both signals 110 and 116 co-propagate in thefirst fiberoptic link 104 towards the wavelength-selective reflector222.

The wavelength-selective reflector 222 may include an optical filter 245and a mirror 246. In operation, the optical filter 245 directs the firstinformation signal 110 towards its intended destination, not shown. Theoptical test signal 116 at the wavelength of 1625 nm in this example isreflected by the mirror 246 to propagate back through the firstfiberoptic link 104 towards the WDM coupler 220, which is constructed tocouple a reflected optical test signal 117 to the photodiode 224. Thetransimpedance amplifier 225 amplifies the photocurrent of thephotodiode 224. The transimpedance amplifier 225 is usually disposedproximate the photodiode 224 to lower the noise figure.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the controller 226 includes anamplifier 234 and a mixer 252 electrically coupled together. Inoperation, the amplifier 234 amplifies a photocurrent 129 representingthe reflected optical test signal 117, and provides an amplified outputsignal 254 to the mixer 252. A reference signal 229A obtained from thelinearly frequency ramped modulation signal 229, e.g. a copy of thelinearly frequency ramped modulation signal 229, is provided to themixer 252 via a control line 227. The mixer 363 mixes the signals 254and 229A, providing a signal 258 at a differential frequency, that is,the frequency offset Δf. Since the reflected optical test signal 117 isdelayed relative to the reference signal 229A due to a finite speed ofpropagation of the optical test signal 116 and the reflected opticaltest signal 117 in the first fiberoptic link 104, the frequency offsetΔf corresponds to a time offset Δt, as shown in FIG. 3A. Therefore, onemay configure the controller 226 to determine a magnitude of the signal258 at the frequency offset Δf, by obtaining a frequency spectrum of themixed signal, and looking for peaks in the frequency spectrum. From thevalue of the frequency offset Δf and the corresponding time offset Δt, adistance to a reflective fault in the first fiberoptic link 104 may bedetermined.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the controller 226 further includes alow-pass filter (LPF) 235, an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 236, aFast Fourier Transform (FFT) unit 237, and a detection unit 238 seriallyelectrically coupled together. In operation, the LPF 235 fillers thesignal 258. which is then digitized by the ADC 236. The FFT unit 237obtains the frequency spectrum of the signal 258. The frequency spectrummay then be analyzed by the detection unit 238 for peaks, to determinefiber breaks, loose connectors, transmittivity loss, etc. The detectioncontrol unit 239 performs general control of the test system 200,including scheduling, reporting, etc.

Turning to FIG. 4, an illustrative frequency spectrum 400 includes areference peak 402 corresponding to the reflection of the optical testsignal 116 from the wavelength-selective reflector 222, as well as threereflection peaks 404, 406, and 408 corresponding to open-fiberreflections of the optical test signal at distances of d₁, d₂ and d₃,respectively, from the test location 106 (FIG. 1A), where d₁>d₂>d₃. Fordata processing purposes, the entire frequency spectrum 400 may bebroken down into “frequency bins” 410 shown in FIG. 4 with dashedrectangles. Bach frequency bin 410 corresponds to a certain distancefrom the test location 106. The detection unit 238 may be configured tosearch for peaks in each of the frequency bins 410, e.g. the reflectionpeaks 404, 406, and 408, thus determining the magnitudes of reflections,as well as distances from the test location 106, at which thesereflections occur. This opens up a possibility of detection a fault suchas fiber breakage. In other words, by measuring the magnitude of thedifferential frequency signal 258 in each frequency bin 410, one caneffectively determine an optical power level of the reflected opticaltest signal 117, which has been reflected from a fiber segment of thefirst fiberoptic link 104 corresponding to each frequency bin 410. Thereflections detected in a particular fiber segment may indicate a fiberbreakage in that segment.

The magnitude and the frequency offset of reference peak 402 provide thereference magnitude M_(REF) and the reference frequency offset Δf_(REF),which may then be used as references for magnitudes M and frequencyoffsets Δf of the reflection peaks 404, 406, and 408. In other words,the magnitudes M and the frequency offsets Δf of the reflection peaks404, 406, and 408 may be determined in relation to, e.g. as a percentageof the reference magnitude M_(REF) and the reference frequency offsetΔf_(REF), respectively. For instance, a mere deterioration of thetransmission of the first fiberoptic link 104 may be determined based onthe detected magnitude of the reflected optical test signal 117 at thereference frequency offset Δf_(REF).

Referring to FIG. 5A, a modulation frequency spectrum 500A of thereflected optical test signal 117 corresponds to a normal operation ofthe first fiberoptic link 104, that is, when no fiber breaks ortransmission deterioration are present in the first fiberoptic link 104.A noise floor 505 shows no pronounced peaks, indicating that noanomalous reflections are present. The reference peak 402 has thereference magnitude M_(REF), indicating that no transmissiondeterioration is present. In one embodiment, the detection unit 238 ofthe controller 226 is configured to determine that a deterioration hasoccurred in the first fiberoptic link when the magnitude M_(REF) of thefirst returning optical signal 117 at the reference modulation frequencyoffset Δf_(REF) is less than a pre-defined threshold 507.

Turning to FIG. 5B, a modulation frequency spectrum 500B of thereflected optical test signal 117 corresponds to a case when a fiberbreak has occurred in the first fiberoptic link 104 between the firstwavelength-selective reflector 122 installed at the first remotelocation 108, at the test location 106. The fiber break caused theoptical test signal 116 to partially reflect from the fiber break point.Since the location of the reflection is closer than the location of thefirst wavelength-selective reflector 122, the modulation frequencyoffset Δf of the first returning optical test signal 117 is smaller thanthe reference modulation frequency offset Δf_(REF). Accordingly, areflection peak 508 has the modulation frequency offset Δf smaller thanΔf_(REF). The detection unit 238 of the controller 226 may be configuredfor determining that the fiber break or cut has occurred in the firstfiberoptic link 104 when the modulation frequency offset Δf of the firstreturning optical test signal 117 is smaller than the referencemodulation frequency offset Δf_(REF). As explained above, the locationof the break or cut may be determined from the magnitude of themodulation frequency offset Δf.

The monitoring system 200 has been used in an experiment aimed atlocating an “open” or a broken or cut fiber in the first fiberoptic link104. The first fiberoptic link 104 has been simulated with 1 m long (“0km fiber”). 10 km long, 25 km long, 35 km long, and 50 km long spans ofan optical fiber. The data traffic at the center wavelength of 1530 nm,corresponding to the first information signal 110, was propagated in thefiber spans of different lengths together with a tone at 1625 nm,corresponding to the optical test signal 116. For each one of the fiberspan lengths, two tests were performed, one with an open connector andone with the wavelength-selective reflector 222 optically coupled at theend of each fiber span. A frequency sweep range of B=5 MHz over asweeping time period of about 2 ms, and a frequency bin size of about 5kHz were used. The results of testing are summarized in the followingTables 1 and 2. In Table 3, the experimental data are organized in rowscorresponding to different fiber span lengths. In Table 2, theexperimental data are organized in rows corresponding to the opticalpower levels detected.

TABLE 1 Calculated Rx power Tone frequency distance Test Condition (dBm)(MHz) (km) 50 km With reflector 222 −34.9 1.259 51.35 fiber Openconnector −42.9 (tone is below N/A noise floor) 35 km With reflector 222−28.2 0.894 36.46 fiber Open connector −40.1 0.898 36.63 25 km Withreflector 222 −24.1 0.63 25.7 fiber Open connector −36.6 0.63 25.7 10 kmWith reflector 222 −17 0.264 10.77 fiber Open connector −30 0.264 10.770 km With reflector 222 −12.2 0 0 fiber Open connector −25.9 0 0

TABLE 2 50 km 35 km 25 km 10 km Optical Power fiber fiber fiber fiber 0km fiber Optical power with −34.9 −28.2 −24.1 −17 −12.2 reflector 222(dBm) Open connector −42.9 −40.1 −36.6 −30 −25.9 optical power (dBm)Optical power 8 11.9 12.5 13 13.7 difference (dB) Tone power 16 23.8 2526 27.4 difference (dB) Detection margin (dB) +/−8 +/−12 +/12.5 +/−13+/−13.7

In Table 2, the “Tone power difference” corresponds to the difference inthe optical power levels of the returning optical test signal 117. Onecan sec that the detection margin of +/−8 dB may be provided for fiberspans as long as 50 km.

Referring to FIG. 6, a typical measured differential modulationfrequency spectrum 600 of the first returning optical test signal 117 isshown. Peak 601 at differential frequency of 630 KHz corresponds toreflections along the first fiberoptic link 104 from thewavelength-selective reflector 222. The modulation frequency/has beenramped from 15 MHz to 20 MHz in this example. In one embodiment, thelight source 112 has a peak optical power of no greater than 5 mW, toavoid impacting normal functioning of the fiberoptic network 102 (FIG.1A). Also in one embodiment, a difference between the second f₂ andfirst f₁ modulation frequencies, that is, the modulation frequency rampamplitude B (FIG. 3A) is at least 5 MHz. The optical test signal 116 maybe amplitude modulated at no less than 80% modulation index.

Turning to FIG. 7 with further reference to FIG. 1B, an embodiment 712(FIG. 7) of the transmitter 112 (FIG. 1B) includes the light source 114(FIG. 7) and an electro-optical modulator 711 optically coupled to thelight source 114. The light source 114 is energized by a DC currentsupply. In this embodiment, a linear frequency ramp generator 728 may beoperationally coupled to the electro-optical modulator 711 formodulating at least one of an amplitude, frequency and a phase of theoptical test signal 116. The linear frequency ramp generator 728 mayprovide a reference signal to the controller 126 (FIG. 1B), or thereference signal 229A to the mixer 252 of the controller 226 of themonitoring system 200 (FIG. 2).

Referring again to FIG. 2, the mixer 252 may be analog or digital.Turning to FIG. 8 with further reference to FIG. 2, a fully digitalcontroller embodiment 826 (FIG. 8) may include an analog to digitalconverter 802 for digitizing the amplified output signal 254 of thefirst photodiode 224 (FIG. 2) and the signal 229A at the linearly rampedmodulation frequency, to obtain respective digitized signals, and adigital signal processing (DSP) unit 804 for mixing the digitizedsignals to obtain a digitized test signal 858 at the differentialfrequency Δf.

Turning to FIG. 9 with further reference to FIG. 1B, a monitoring system900 of FIG. 9 is an embodiment of the monitoring system 100 of FIG. 1B.Below, only differences between the monitoring systems 900 and 100 aredescribed. An optical splitter 932 of the monitoring system 900 (FIG. 9)includes first 941 and second 942 input ports and first 951 and second952 output ports. A first test channel 918 of the monitoring system 900further includes a reference photodctector 924 optically coupled to thesecond output port 952 for defecting a portion of the optical testsignal 116 coupled to the first fiberoptic link 104 at the test location106, so as to obtain a reference signal 929A.

A controller 926 of the monitoring system 900 may further include amixer, not shown, tor mixing a photocurrent 129A generated by the firstsignal photodetector 124 with the reference signal 929A to obtain asignal at the differential frequency, or the modulation frequency offsetΔf. The controller 926 may further be configured for determining themagnitude M(Δf) of the returning optical test signal 117 at thedifferential frequency Δf, and a value of the differential frequency Δf.

The system 100 of FIGS. 1A and 1B, 200 of FIG. 2, and 900 of FIG. 9 maybe expanded to accommodate in-service monitoring of other fiberopticlinks of the fiberoptic network 102. Referring to FIG. 10, thefiberoptic network 102 includes a first fiberoptic link 104A spanningbetween the test location 106 and a first remote location 108A, and asecond fiberoptic link 104B spanning between the test location 106 and asecond remote location 108B. The first fiberoptic link 104A carries afirst information signal 110A at a first wavelength between the testlocation 106 and the first remote location 108A. and the secondfiberoptic link 104B carries a second information signal 110B at asecond wavelength between the test location 106 and the second remotelocation 108B.

To monitor the first fiberoptic link 104A, one embodiment of amulti-channel monitoring system 1000 includes a first test channel 118A.which is similar to the first test channel 118 of the system 100 ofFIGS. 1A and 1B. Briefly, the first test channel 118A includes a firstcoupler 120A for optically coupling the light source 114 to the firstfiberoptic link 104A at the test location 106, for causing the opticaltest signal 116 to propagate along the first fiberoptic link 104Atowards the first remote location 108A. A first wavelength-selectivereflector 122A is provided for optically coupling into the firstfiberoptic link 104A at the first remote location 108A, for redirectingthe optical test signal 116 to propagate back to the first coupler 120Aat the test location 106, while propagating the first information signal110A. A first signal photodctector 124A is optically coupled to thefirst coupler 120A for detecting a first returning optical test signal117A propagating in a direction from the first remote location 108Atowards the first coupler 120A.

To monitor the second fiberoptic link 104B, the system 1000 furtherincludes a second test channel 118B similar to the first test channel118A. The second test channel 118B may include a second coupler 120B foroptically coupling the light source 114 to the second fiberoptic link104B at the test location 106, for causing the optical test signal 116to propagate along the second fiberoptic link 104B towards the secondremote location 108B. A second wavelength-selective reflector 122B maybe provided for optically coupling into the second fiberoptic link 104Bat the second remote location 108B, for redirecting the optical testsignal 116 to propagate back to the second coupler 120B at the testlocation 106, while propagating the second information signal 110B. Asecond signal photodctector 124B may be optically coupled to the secondcoupler 120B for detecting a second returning optical test signal 117Bpropagating in a direction from the second remote location 108B towardsthe coupler 120B.

In the embodiment shown, the system 1000 further includes a test signalsplitter 1002 having an input port 1004 and first 1006A and second 1006Boutput ports. The input port 1004 is optically coupled to the lightsource 114 of the transmitter 112, the first output port 1006A isoptically coupled to the first coupler 120A of the first test channel118A, and the second output 1006B port is optically coupled to thesecond coupler 120B of the second test channel 118B.

A controller 1026 of the system 1000 is similar to the controller 126 ofthe system 100 of FIGS. 1A and 1B. The controller 1026 of the system1000 is operationally coupled to first and second test channels 118A and118B. Specifically, the controller 1026 is coupled the first signalphotodctector 124A and the second signal photodetcctor 124B andconfigured for determining magnitudes M_(B) and M_(B) of the first andsecond returning optical test signals 117A and 117B. respectively, anddetermining modulation frequency effects Δf_(A) and Δf_(B) of the firstand second returning optical test signals 117A and 117B, respectively,relative to a current value of the periodically swept modulationfrequency f. The controller 1026 may also be configured for determininga fault in the first and second fiberoptic links 104A/B based on thedetermined magnitudes M_(B) and M_(B) and the determined modulationfrequency offsets Δf_(A) and Δf_(B) of the first and second returningoptical test signals 117A and 117B. respectively. The system 1000 mayfurther be upgraded or expanded to include similar test channels 118C,118D, 118E, etc. for in-service monitoring other fiberoptic links asthese are added to the fiberoptic network 102. The controller 1026 maybe time-shared.

Several non-limiting, illustrative implementations of the system 100 ofFIGS. 1A and 1B, 200 of FIG. 2, 900 of FIG. 9, and 1000 of FIG. 10 willnow be considered.

Referring to FIG. 11A, a system 1100A for in-service monitoring of thefirst fiberoptic link 104 may include a modulated light source 1112 anda test channel 1118A. The modulated light source 1112 may includeserially electrically coupled a linear frequency ramp generator 1128A, alaser driver 1128B, and the light source 114. Function of these elementsis similar to that of the system 200 of FIG. 2. specifically the signalsource 228A, the laser driver 228B, and the laser diode 214. An opticalsplitter 1102 may be provided for future addition of test channels.

Still referring to FIG. 11A, the test channel 1118A of the system 1100Aof FIG. 11A includes similar elements as the test channel 118 of thesystem 100 of FIGS. 1A and 1B, specifically the WDM 130, the opticalsplitter 132, the first signal photodetector 124, preferably anavalanche photodiode (APD). The TIA 225 may be provided to boost signalto noise ratio. An additional 1×2 coupler 1103 may be provided forcoupling another test channel, not shown. An additional 2×2 coupler 1172optically coupled to a pair of photodiodes 1174 may be provided forpassively measuring power levels of λ₁, the upstream bidirectionalcustomer data being connected via an optical connector 1176.

One distinctive feature of the first test channel 118A is that the testchannel 1118A includes an internal signal processing circuitry includinga difference detector 1152, a time delay Δt/distance computation unit1153, and a power determination unit 1155 coupled to a DSP unit 1104 forperforming comparison with corresponding reference values provided by atest signal reflecting from the wavelength-selective reflector 122.Finally, an input/output circuit 1139 is provided for interfacing withexternal circuitry, not shown, for reporting link status/abnormalcondition(s) detected.

Turning to FIG. 11B, a system 1100B for in-service monitoring of thefirst fiberoptic link 104 is similar to the system 1100A of FIG. 11A.One distinctive feature of the system 1100B of FIG. 11B, as comparedwith the system 1100A of FIG. 11A, is that a test channel 1118B of thesystem 1100B of FIG. 11B includes a reference photodctector 1124 forproviding a reference electrical signal, similarly to the referencephotodetector 924 of the monitoring system 900 of FIG. 9.

Referring now to FIG. 11C, an system 1100C for in-service monitoring ofthe first fiberoptic link 104 is similar to the system 1100B of FIG.11B. One distinctive feature of the system 1100C of FIG. 11C. ascompared with the system 1100B of FIG. 11B. is that the modulated lightsource 1112 is integrated into a test channel 1118C. This allows thereference photodetector 1124 to be coupled to the optical splitter 1102.simplifying overall construction.

Turning to FIG. 11D, a system 1100D for in-service monitoring of thefirst fiberoptic link 104 is similar to the system 1100C of FIG. 11C.The system 1100D of FIG. 11D is further integrated into a single,standalone unit. In this embodiment, the light source 114 is directlyoptically coupled to a single splitter 132 and a single WDM 130. The DSPunit 1104 may be implemented in field-programmable gate array (FPGA).System 1100D may be implemented as a single small form pluggable (SFP)package, providing considerable cost and space savings.

Referring to FIG. 12 with further reference to FIGS. 1A and 1B, a method1200 for in-service monitoring of the fiberoptic network 102 may beprovided according to one embodiment. The method 1200 includes a step1201 of generating the optical test signal 116 at the test wavelengthλ_(T) different from the first wavelength λ₁. The optical test signal116 is modulated at a modulation frequency f periodically swept at thesweep period T from the first modulation frequency f₁ to the secondmodulation frequency f₂. In a preferred embodiment, the modulationfrequency f is ramped linearly between the first modulation frequency f₁and the second modulation frequency f₂ during each sweep period T.

In a next step 1202, the optical test signal 116 is optically coupled tothe first fiberoptic link 104 at the test location 106. thereby causingthe optical test signal 116 to propagate along the first fiberoptic link104 to the first remote location 108. In a next step 1203, thewavelength-selective reflector 122 disposed at the first remote location108 is used to redirect the optical test signal 116 to propagate backtowards the test location 106, while propagating the first informationsignal 110 through the wavelength-selective reflector 122. In a nextstep 1204, the returning optical test signal 117 at the test wavelengthλ_(T) is detected.

In a next step 1205, the magnitude M of the returning optical testsignal 117 the modulation frequency offset Δf of the returning opticaltest signal 117 is detected, and is compared to the current value of theperiodically swept modulation frequency. Finally, in a step 1206, afault in the first fiberoptic link 104 is detected based on thedetermined magnitude M and the determined modulation frequency offset Δfof the returning optical test signal 117. The detection step 1206 mayinclude comparing the determined magnitude M and the determinedmodulation frequency offset Δf to a reference magnitude M_(REF) and areference modulation frequency offset Δf_(REF), respectively, of theoptical test signal 117 redirected by the wavelength-selective reflector122 in the reflecting step 1203, as explained above.

In one embodiment, the detection step 1206 may include determining thata fiber break has occurred in the first fiberoptic link 104 when themodulation frequency offset Δf of the returning optical test signal 117is smaller than the reference modulation frequency offset Δf_(REF).Furthermore in one embodiment, the detection step 1206 may includedetermining that a deterioration has occurred in the fiberoptic linkwhen the magnitude M of the returning optical signal at the referencemodulation frequency offset is less than the reference magnitudeM_(REF). To ensure that the first information signal 110 at the firstwavelength λ₁ is not perturbed during transmission, the optical testsignal 116 may have a peak optical power of no greater than 1 mW.Furthermore in one embodiment, the first fiberoptic link 104 may carry asecond information signal at a second wavelength λ₂ from the remotelocation 108 to the test location 106. The second wavelength λ₂ istypically different from the first wavelength λ₁. The test wavelength isdifferent from both the first wavelength λ₁ and the second wavelengthλ₂.

The hardware used to implement the various illustrative logics, logicalblocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the aspectsdisclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purposeprocessor, a digital signal processor f DSP), an application specificintegrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) orother programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic,discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed toperform the functions described herein. A general-purpose processor maybe a microprocessor, but, in the alternative, the processor may be anyconventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. Aprocessor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices,e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality ofmicroprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSPcore, or any other such configuration. Alternatively, some steps ormethods may be performed by circuitry that is specific to a givenfunction.

The present disclosure is not to be limited in scope by the specificembodiments described herein. Indeed, other various embodiments andmodifications, in addition to those described herein, will be apparentto those of ordinary skill in the art from the foregoing description andaccompanying drawings. Thus, such other embodiments and modificationsare intended to fall within the scope of the present disclosure.Further, although the present disclosure has been described herein inthe context of a particular implementation in a particular environmentfor a particular purpose, those of ordinary skill in the art willrecognize that its usefulness is not limited thereto and that thepresent disclosure may be beneficially implemented in any number ofenvironments for any number of purposes. Accordingly, the claims setforth below should be construed in view of the full breadth and spiritof the present disclosure as described herein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system comprising: a controller configured to:determine a magnitude of a returning optical test signal; determine amodulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signalrelative to a current value of a periodically swept modulationfrequency; and detect fault information in a fiberoptic link based on acomparison of at least one of: the determined magnitude of the returningoptical test signal and a reference magnitude of an optical test signalredirected by a wavelength-selective reflector; or a comparison betweenthe determined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical testsignal to a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical testsignal.
 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a photodetector todetect the returning optical test signal.
 3. The system of claim 1,where the controller is further configured to: detect, based on thedetermined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical testsignal being less than the reference modulation frequency offset of theoptical test signal, that there is a break in the fiberoptic link. 4.The system of claim 1, where the controller is further configured to:detect, based on the determined magnitude of the returning optical testsignal being less than the reference magnitude of the optical testsignal, that there is a deterioration in the fiberoptic link.
 5. Thesystem of claim 1, where the wavelength-selective reflector is opticallycoupled to the fiberoptic link.
 6. The system of claim 1, where thewavelength-selective reflector is configured to redirect the opticaltest signal at a first wavelength, and the first wavelength is a testwavelength.
 7. The system of claim 6, where the wavelength-selectivereflector is configured to propagate an information signal, at a secondwavelength, to an antenna.
 8. The system of claim 1, where the returningoptical test signal is a first returning optical test signal, thefiberoptic link is a first fiberoptic link, and controller is furtherconfigured to: determine a magnitude of a second returning optical testsignal; determine a modulation frequency offset of the second returningoptical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically sweptmodulation frequency; and detect fault information in a secondfiberoptic link.
 9. The system of claim 8, where the controller, whendetecting the fault information in the second fiberoptic link, isconfigured to: detect the fault information in the second fiberopticlink, based on a comparison of at least one of: the determined magnitudeof the second returning optical test signal and the reference magnitudeof the optical test signal; or a comparison between the determinedmodulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signalto a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal.10. The system of claim 1, where the returning optical test signal isbased on a test signal that is modulated at the periodically sweptmodulation frequency.
 11. A method comprising: determining, by acontroller, a magnitude of a returning optical test signal; determining,by the controller, a modulation frequency offset of the returningoptical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically sweptmodulation frequency; and detecting, by the controller, faultinformation in a fiberoptic link based on a comparison of at least oneof: the determined magnitude of the returning optical test signal and areference magnitude of an optical test signal redirected by awavelength-selective reflector; or a comparison between the determinedmodulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal to areference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal. 12.The method of claim 11, further comprising: detecting the returningoptical test signal.
 13. The method of claim 11, further comprising:detecting, based on the determined modulation frequency offset of thereturning optical test signal being less than the reference modulationfrequency offset of the optical test signal, that there is a break inthe fiberoptic link.
 14. The method of claim 11, further comprising:detecting, based on the determined magnitude of the returning opticaltest signal being less than the reference magnitude of the optical testsignal, that there is a deterioration in the fiberoptic link.
 15. Themethod of claim 11, where the wavelength-selective reflector isoptically coupled to the fiberoptic link.
 16. The method of claim 11,where the wavelength-selective reflector is configured to redirect theoptical test signal at a first wavelength, and the first wavelength is atest wavelength.
 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising:propagating an information signal, at a second wavelength, to anantenna.
 18. The method of claim 11, where the returning optical testsignal is a first returning optical test signal, the fiberoptic link isa first fiberoptic link, and the method further comprises: determining amagnitude of a second returning optical test signal; determining amodulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signalrelative to a current value of a periodically swept modulationfrequency; and detecting fault information in a second fiberoptic link.19. The method of claim 18, where detecting the fault information in thesecond fiberoptic link includes: detecting the fault information in thesecond fiberoptic link, based on a comparison of at least one of: thedetermined magnitude of the second returning optical test signal and thereference magnitude of the optical test signal; or a comparison betweenthe determined modulation frequency offset of the second returningoptical test signal to a reference modulation frequency offset of theoptical test signal.
 20. The method of claim 11, where the returningoptical test signal is based on a test signal that is modulated at theperiodically swept modulation frequency.